SCIENCE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP AWARD Release Date: December 22, 1999 PA NUMBER: PAR-00-036 (see replacement RFA-RR-04-004) National Center for Research Resources Application Receipt Date: March 16, 2000 for FY 2000 awards; thereafter, October 1, annually PURPOSE The Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA) Program encourages biomedical and/or behavioral scientists to work as partners with science museum educators, media experts, and other interested organizations on projects to improve the student (K-12) and the public understanding of the health sciences. This Program Announcement (PA) is intended to support either the development (Phase I) or the dissemination (Phase II) of highly meritorious and innovative models for enhancing K-12 student and/or general public health science education. The biomedical research community is engaged in exciting and highly complex research to cure or delay the onset of cancer, heart disease, diabetes, arthritis and many other conditions. The research community is also exploring new frontiers in molecular biology and mapping of the human genome. The general public is aware and supportive of these efforts, but lacks an understanding of the purposes, implications and findings of biomedical research and their impact on the health of this nation. Science museums and centers are highly trusted and respected institutions within their respective communities and throughout the nation. Science museums and science centers work closely with schools, research institutions and other community organizations to build public understanding of complex scientific topics. Science museums use interactive and "hands on" learning techniques to engage youth and adults in exploring science and in seeking knowledge. Consequently, science museums and science centers are strongly encouraged to submit applications in response to this announcement. The National Center for Research Resources (NCRR) encourages the submission of grant applications from eligible organizations to 1) develop and evaluate model biomedical and/or behavioral science education partnership programs that focus on health-related research; 2) develop effective strategies for the dissemination of successful existing innovative biomedical and/or behavioral science education partnership models; 3) inform the public about health research so that they can make healthier lifestyle choices from advances that emerge from health-related research supported by the National Institutes of Health (NIH); 4) pique the interest of youngsters in science in order to increase the number of college science majors. This should increase the number of students, particularly members of underrepresented groups, who pursue graduate degrees in the biomedical sciences; and 5) develop a more science competent workforce. The NIH is offering programmatic assistance for applicants through a workshop scheduled for January 21, 2000 at: Two Rockledge Centre 6701 Rockledge Drive Room 9112/9116 Bethesda, MD For updated information call: 301-435-0788 HEALTHY PEOPLE 2000 The Public Health Service (PHS) is committed to achieving the health promotion and disease prevention objectives of "Healthy People 2000", a PHS- led national activity for setting priority areas. This PA, Science Education Partnership Award (SEPA), is related to all priority areas. Potential applicants may obtain a copy of "Healthy People 2000" at http://odphp.osophs.dhhs.gov/pubs/hp2000. ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS Domestic organizations with a scientific and/or educational mission are eligible to submit applications. Such entities include science museums, colleges and universities, state and local education agencies, biomedically- oriented professional societies, science technology centers, research laboratories, media producers, private foundations, and other public and private education-related organizations, for-profit or non-profit. Racial/ethnic minority individuals, women, and persons with disabilities are encouraged to apply as principal investigators. Foreign entities are not eligible. MECHANISM OF SUPPORT Awards under this PA will use the education projects (R25) grant mechanism. The applicant will be solely responsible for the planning, direction, and execution of the program. This PA is a continuing solicitation and is effective until otherwise announced in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts. The earliest annual award date for SEPA applicants responding to the March 16, 2000 deadline will be September 29, 2000. For applications submitted for the October 1, 2000 deadline, the earliest award date will be July 1 of the following year. Because of the wide range of programs that may be proposed, the duration and size of awards may vary also. However, requests may not exceed three years of support and requested annual direct costs may not exceed $300,000. Applicants may choose to submit proposals that combine Phase I and Phase II; the project period for combined Phase I/Phase II applications may not exceed five years at an annual direct cost of $300,000. Combining Phase I and Phase II may be of particular value for applications submitted from science museums and technology centers. Facilities and administrative (F&A) costs, other than those awarded to State or local government agencies, will be reimbursed at eight percent of total allowable direct costs. State and local government agencies will receive reimbursement at their full F&A cost rate. The number of applications funded in response to this PA is contingent upon sufficient number of highly meritorious applications received and the availability of funds as well as the diversity of programs in the portfolio and geographic distribution. Conditions of Award Two copies of the finished product must be provided along with the annual or final progress report. Any products derived from the project activity must be publicized and must be freely available in the public domain. Any project funded under the SEPA Program may not be used to endorse or publicize any profit-making activities. All publications, audiovisual materials and other products resulting from SEPA activities supported entirely or in substantial part by NIH should include the following or comparable acknowledgment of support: "The project described was supported by Grant Number R25 RR XXXXX, from the National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health" and "Its contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of NCRR or NIH." A progress report must be submitted to the Office of Grants Management, NCRR, as part of the noncompeting continuation application submitted each year, due two months prior to the anniversary date of the project. A final progress report is due within 90 days of the end of the project period. Reports should summarize the goals, methods, and results of the activity undertaken. It should be accompanied by at least two copies of any materials intended for dissemination developed as part of the SEPA project. The conditions of award cited above represent only a portion of applicable NIH policies under which SEPA awards will be administered. All awards will be administered under the NIH Grants Policy Statement (revised October 1998), available on the NIH homepage at https://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/nihgps/. RESEARCH OBJECTIVES Background In order for the NIH to fulfill its mission, it is necessary for adequate numbers of students to enter and remain in mathematics and science education tracks so that there will be a sufficient supply of scientists, engineers, and technicians to meet the Nation's future workforce needs in the biomedical sciences and in the sciences related to health. The NIH also is dependent on a scientifically literate public that understands the behaviors and lifestyles that increase the risk of disease and the necessity of the lay public to understand the key role of NIH-supported research which impacts on disease prevention, diagnosis of disease, and novel therapies that may alleviate or cure diseases. Collectively, the purpose of NIH-based research is to improve health of people everywhere. Program Characteristics The SEPA Program is intended to 1) support the development and evaluation of model biomedical and/or behavioral science education partnership programs (Phase I) or 2) provide funding for the development of effective strategies for the dissemination of successful existing innovative biomedical and/or behavioral science education partnership models (Phase II). The program will support grants designed to encourage scientists to work with educators, community leaders and others to improve student and public understanding of science, and increase interest of young people in health science careers. The focus of student activities is to be at the kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) level. The scientists who study disease and illness, and those investigators who carry out basic research relating to these disorders, have a major contribution to make by conveying their knowledge and also the excitement in doing research. However, it is essential that scientists work with elementary and secondary school educators and administrators, community leaders, foundations, industry, museums, the media, and others in order to make effective contributions to improving science education and improving public understanding of both the process and accomplishments of science. The program will support the development or the dissemination of model programs that join working scientists, educators and others in enhancing the pre-college science education and public understanding in biomedical science areas such as molecular biology, molecular genetics, immunology, neuroscience, and bioinformatics; behavioral science areas such as health promotion and prevention of disease, such as AIDS; and ethical issues relating to, for example, genetic engineering, environmental health, and responsible use of animals and humans in research. These are but a few examples; numerous other biomedical and/or behavioral science areas may be proposed. While SEPA projects must represent new activities and focus on health-related science, coordination with existing science education improvement programs, such as those funded by the National Science Foundation, the Department of Energy, the Department of Education, and others, are encouraged. The types of activities that may be proposed include, for example, the enhancement of current concepts in health sciences for present and prospective pre-college teachers; development of innovative curricula involving state-of-the-art technologies; facilitation of linkages between biomedical scientists and local community and school programs, involving students, teachers and parents; inclusion of a variety of media options in an educational partnership program; traveling exhibits and mobile science laboratories; large-format, high visibility films that can reach large audiences in a multitude of settings; interactive electronic media programs and experiences; hands-on laboratory experiences for students in faculty research laboratories (this is allowable for academic institutions and can be requested for Phase II proposals only); and the provision of scientific/educational consultation to professional or educational organizations or community groups to facilitate scientific literacy. Many other types of activities may be proposed. Use of advanced technologies that incorporate modern pedagogical approaches, such as technology-based curricula and interactive computer strategies for enhancing student and teacher learning, are encouraged, as are programs that support the enhancement of biomedical science literacy for underrepresented groups in science, including women and minorities. Programs aimed at selected target populations, such as ethnic, racial, disadvantaged or gender- specific activities, must be culturally appropriate for these populations. Grant funds may be requested for expenses clearly related and necessary to conduct the projects, including both direct costs that can be specifically identified with the project and allowable facilities and administrative (F&A) costs of the institution. Expenses must be itemized and justified for each year of the proposed project. If the didactic materials are targeted to high school students, Phase II applications may include a summer research experience component for high school students. In these instances, the applicant must provide the names and competencies of the selection committee; describe the selection process, including the selection criteria; and include 3-4 examples of the research experiences that students will be provided. SPECIAL REQUIREMENTS An annual SEPA Principal Investigator Meeting will be convened to foster collaboration, discuss newly emerging national strategies, coordinate dissemination, share evaluation methodologies and outcomes, and minimize duplication of efforts. Travel funds for these activities should be included in the budget request for each year, and a statement regarding willingness to participate in these activities should be included in the application. INCLUSION OF WOMEN AND MINORITIES IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of the NIH that women and members of minority groups and their subpopulations must be included in all NIH supported biomedical and behavioral research projects involving human subjects, unless a clear and compelling rationale and justification is provided that inclusion is inappropriate with respect to the health of the subjects or the purpose of the research. This policy results from the NIH Revitalization Act of 1993 (Section 492B of Public Law 103-43). All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Guidelines For Inclusion of Women and Minorities as Subjects in Clinical Research," which have been published in the Federal Register of March 28, 1994 (FR 59 14508-14513) and in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, Vol. 23, No. 11, March 18, 1994 available on the web at the following URL address: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not94-100.html Investigators also may obtain copies of the policy from the program staff listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. INCLUSION OF CHILDREN AS PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH INVOLVING HUMAN SUBJECTS It is the policy of NIH that children (i.e., individuals under the age of 21) be included in all human subjects research, conducted or supported by the NIH, unless there are scientific and ethical reasons not to include them. This policy applies to all initial (Type 1) applications submitted for receipt dates after October 1, 1998. All investigators proposing research involving human subjects should read the "NIH Policy and Guidelines on the Inclusion of Children as Participants in Research Involving Human Subjects" that was published in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts, March 6, 1998, and is available at the following URL address: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not98-024.html Investigators also may obtain copies of the policy from the program staff listed under INQUIRIES. Program staff may also provide additional relevant information concerning the policy. APPLICATION PROCEDURES The research grant application form PHS 398 (rev. 4/98) is to be used in applying for these grants. These forms are available in most institutional offices of sponsored research and may be requested from the Office of Extramural Outreach and Information Resources, Office of Extramural Research, National Institutes of Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 6207, MSC 7910, Bethesda, MD 20892-7910, telephone 301/710-0267, fax 301/480-0525, Email: [email protected]. Applicants must follow the instructions provided in form PHS 398 except for the following special instructions below. Face Page Item 1. Also indicate whether this is a Phase I, a Phase II or a combination of both Phase I and II application. Item 2. Check "YES" and identify the number and title of this PA. Items 4 and 5 must be completed. Item 6. The project period begin date should be the anticipated award date (i.e., July 1 or later). The length of the project period may not exceed three years for applications requesting separate support for Phase I and II. Applications that request support for both Phase I and II may request support for up to five years. Research Plan Except as noted below, the following guidelines are applicable to both Phase I and Phase II applications. In general, the research plan should be structured to provide information sufficient to allow the reviewers to assess the project in terms of the review criteria stated below. Note that there are separate sets of review criteria; one for plans to develop new SEPA models (Phase I), another for plans to develop strategies to disseminate SEPA-type models that have already been developed (Phase II). Goals and Objectives (Phase I and Phase II applications) Identify the long-range goals for the project and describe the specific objectives for the proposed project period. Significance and Rationale (Phase I and Phase II applications) Briefly summarize the background leading to the development of this plan. Explain why the particular strategy was chosen. Include information on the process and rationale for selecting the scientific area, the educational approach, and the target population, and indicate how this project will address an unmet need. Describe the advantages and limitations of the model selected, and its potential for widespread dissemination and adaptability for use by others. Preliminary Studies (Phase I applications only) For Phase I (model development), include any preliminary studies relevant to this application by the principal investigator and/or other key personnel. Also provide any other information that will help to establish the experience and competence of both program leadership and partnership organizations to effectively carry out the proposed project. Progress Report (Phase II applications only) For Phase II (dissemination), provide a detailed progress report of achievements with the existing pilot model, including: A description of the educational approach, the scientific content, and the nature and extent of existing educational and scientific partnerships and collaborative interactions. A detailed description of the educational material produced. Identify the actual materials as "Exhibits" and include in the application. Do not label these materials as appendices. Some examples of exhibit items are: print materials (newsletters, booklets), videos, diskettes, and other computer software. Limit exhibits to items that are readily portable and to materials considered to be essential to review. A description of the evaluation process. Summarize the results of this process. Include the evaluation instruments in the appendix. A summary of the impact of the current pilot model to date. Include numbers of students, teachers and/or the public impacted by this approach, and other relevant outreach accomplishments. A description of any dissemination activities to date, or a description of the stage of development of the current model with respect to future dissemination plans. Proposed Plan (Phase I and Phase II applications) Describe in detail the activities proposed and how they will contribute to achieving the stated goals of the program. Give quantitative data on the numbers of teachers, students, and/or members of the general public projected to be involved and the quantity and types of educational materials to be produced and/or disseminated. Explain the relevance and potential of this project for dissemination to a broad population, including efforts aimed at underrepresented groups in science, including both women and minorities. Explain clearly the nature and extent of educational and scientific partnerships and collaborations to be developed (or, for those already established, any plans for expansion or modification), and the roles of key participants in the planning and conduct of the project. Provide documentation of the interest and commitment of partnership members to this project. If the didactic materials are targeted to high school students, Phase II applications may include a summer research experience component for high school students. In these instances, the applicant must: provide the names and competencies of the selection committee; describe the selection process, including the selection criteria; and provide 3-4 examples of the research experiences that students will be provided. Describe the administrative plan to organize and manage the overall project, and provide a timetable for the various tasks and activities for the entire project period requested. Describe the development and implementation of the plan for formative and summative evaluations of project activities. Include strategies for revisions to evaluative instruments and educational processes and/or materials. For Phase II (dissemination) applications, describe the plans for continuation of the program following the end of support from SEPA/NCRR. Appendix Material Information essential for the review of the application should not be included in the appendix. Appendix materials submitted with the application must adhere to the PHS 398 requirements. Submit a signed, typewritten original of the application, including the Checklist, and three signed, exact photocopies in one package to: Center for Scientific Review (formerly Division of Research Grants) National Institutes of Health 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 1040, MSC 7710 Bethesda, MD 20892-7710 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) At the time of submission, two additional copies of the application, and five copies of the Appendix, are to be sent to: Office of Review National Center For Research Resources 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 6018, MSC 7965 Bethesda, MD 20892-7965 Bethesda, MD 20817 (for express/courier service) After the March 16, 2000 receipt date, applications must be received by the October 1 deadline. If an application is received after the deadline, it will be returned to the applicant without review. REVIEW CONSIDERATIONS Applications will be reviewed by NIH staff for completeness and responsiveness. Applications that are incomplete or non-responsive to this PA will be returned to the applicant. Applications that are considered complete and responsive will be evaluated for scientific and technical merit by an appropriate peer review group convened by the NCRR in accordance with NIH peer review procedures, using the review criteria stated below. As part of the initial merit review, all applications will receive a written critique and undergo a process in which only those applications deemed to have the highest scientific merit, generally the top half of applications under review, will be discussed, assigned a priority score, and receive a second-level review by the National Advisory Research Resources Council. Review Criteria Phase I - Development of New Models Significance of Model o Appropriateness of proposed model to NCRR SEPA goals. o Significance and merit of the proposed educational pilot model in terms of educational goals to be achieved for the target population and evidence of unmet needs to be addressed. Potential adaptability of the model for use by others. o Significance of biomedical and/or behavioral science content and participation by active scientists in appropriate disciplines. o Relevance and potential for dissemination to a broad population, including underrepresented groups in science. Program Design and Evaluation o Overall quality, feasibility, and adequacy of the design of the program to achieve its specific aims and long-term objectives. o Merit of the program's evaluation plans, including formative and summative evaluation strategies. Resources and Personnel o Qualifications, experience and commitment of the principal investigator and other key personnel. o Appropriateness of proposed educational and biomedical and/or behavioral scientific partnerships and collaborations. o Adequacy of institutional commitment from partnership members, including evidence of contributions to the project, availability of resources, and/or other examples of institutional commitment. Phase II - Dissemination of Existing Models Significance of Model o Appropriateness of selected model to NCRR SEPA goals. o Significance and merit of the selected educational pilot model in terms of educational goals to be achieved for the target population and evidence of unmet needs to be addressed. o Relevance and potential impact of dissemination to a broad population, including underrepresented groups in science. o Adequacy of biomedical and/or behavioral science content, and participation by active scientists in appropriate disciplines. Progress and Current Status of Model o Significance of past progress, including evaluation of existing model, program impact to date, and readiness for dissemination. o Effectiveness of existing resources and personnel, including partnerships and collaborations. o Applicability of model to broad populations. o If summer research experiences are proposed for students, the adequacy of the proposed plans for selecting and preparing the students to pursue college careers in the sciences. Program Design and evaluation o Overall quality, feasibility, and adequacy of the design of the program to achieve its specific aims and long term objectives. o Merit of the plans to evaluate dissemination activities, including formative and summative evaluation strategies. o Adequacy of accessibility, feasibility, scope, and cost effectiveness of dissemination strategies. o Appropriateness of plans to sustain the program after the period of grant support ends. Resources and Personnel o Appropriateness and qualifications of the program leadership and other personnel to implement future plans as proposed. o Adequacy of scientific and educational partnerships and collaborations for the proposed dissemination activities. o Adequacy of institutional commitment from partnership members, including evidence of contributions to the project, availability of resources, and/or other examples of institutional commitment. AWARD CRITERIA Award decisions will be based on the technical merit of the application as determined by peer review, availability of funds, and programmatic priorities to ensure a balance among the various types of programs, populations served, and geographic distribution. Consideration will be given to reaching underrepresented groups, including women and minorities. INQUIRIES Written and telephone inquiries concerning this PA are encouraged. The opportunity to clarify any issues or questions from potential applicants is welcome. Direct inquiries regarding programmatic issues to: Dr. Krishan K. Arora Research Infrastructure National Center for Research Resources 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 6030, MSC 7965 Bethesda, MD 20892-7965 Telephone: (301) 435-0766 Email: [email protected] Direct inquiries regarding fiscal matters to: Mr. Paul Karadbil Office of Grants and Contracts Management National Center for Research Resources 6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 6218, MSC 7965 Bethesda, MD 20892-7965 Telephone: (301) 435-0844 Email: [email protected] AUTHORITY AND REGULATIONS This program is described in the Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance No. 93.3992. Awards are made under authorization of the Public Health Service Act, Title IV, Part A (Public Law 78-410, as amended by Public Law 99-158, 42 USC 241 and 285) and administered under NIH grants policies and Federal Regulations 42 CFR 52 and 45 CFR Parts 74 and 92. This program is not subject to the intergovernmental review requirements of Executive Order 12372 or Health Systems Agency review. The PHS strongly encourages all grant recipients to provide a smoke-free workplace and promote the non-use of all tobacco products. In addition, Public Law 103-227, the Pro-Children Act of 1994, prohibits smoking in certain facilities (or in some cases, any portion of a facility) in which regular or routine education, library, day care, health care, or early childhood development services are provided to children. This is consistent with the PHS mission to protect and advance the physical and mental health of the American people.
Return to NIH Guide Main Index
Office of Extramural Research (OER) |
National Institutes of Health (NIH) 9000 Rockville Pike Bethesda, Maryland 20892 |
Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) |
||||||||